Liberals bring up the argument of having car insurance, but it's flawed because car insurance is to allow people to drive a car, which is a privilege, one doesn't have to drive if they don't want to and they don't have to have car insurance if they don't own a car. So isn't forcing someone to have health insurance or face being fined $750 or 2% of your income unconstitutional even if the person doesn't want health insurance. I see a lot of lawsuits in the future because of this provision.
--------------------
There are already suits being prepared. There is nothing in the constitution that grants the federal government the power to require purchasing something as a criteria for residence.
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment