If the government can't compel everyone to own a firearm or printing press then why health insurance?

I don't see how this can possibly withstand a constitutional challenge
--------------------
Because if you don't have health care coverage, and you're hurt or fall ill, you're still going to require medical attention, and it will be at the expense of taxpayers, regardless... by the way, it's not mandatory.. most people will be covered by their employers, who otherwise face fines for not providing health care, and even if that doesn't apply to you, you can provide proof of the financial assets necessary to cover potential medical expenses
Source